
i once drove 80 miles to a tournament only to lose my first game in 6 moves. at our level, i feel the most important goal of an opening is to reach a balanced middle game with fighting chances. because i don't have much time to study openings i'm trying to build a repertoire that is not too steeped in theory and not so offbeat that i get crushed. i'm impressed by players that can play 1. e4 or 1. d4 depending on their mood - but that's not me. i'm a 1. e4 player (and i reply to 1. e4 with 1... e5, and this gives me the chance to mention my first resource. it's a book by GM John Emms called 'Play the open games as black'. i don't have many books, but this one is really good. it's actually a useful resource for players of the white and black pieces, and often gives 2 alternative moves in a position: one that is solid and one that is more double-edged.
when it comes to chess books, no-one tells you how to read them. this may sound like a daft comment but i've experimented with using a magnetic chess set on a plane, at home with a regular board and in front of the computer. i still don't know what is best. there's something to be said for sitting in front of a real board (it makes me think more thoroughly and might help in tournaments by creating a 'search image'). but a chess engine is helpful because sometimes a book will not suggest a move that i think should be played. having an engine handy is useful for knowing what the refutation is.
this brings me to my second resource, the chess engine. in the past i used PC computers and had fritz 5 installed. this had some great features, the best of which was that it would annotate games using language (e.g. 16...Bxd3 - this is where Black starts to go downhill) rather than just reeling off variations. as i graduated to using a mac i started using Shredder Classic
, which is pretty good. But there are plenty of engines (and GUIs - graphical user interfaces) out there that are free to download and are more than sufficient for players of our strength. I currently use Glaurung (www.glaurung.com)i think it is important to read through opening ideas fairly frequently and to test yourself by closing the book and seeing if you can navigate through the variations without having a 'prop'.
i'm thinking about openings because i have a tournament coming up in a few weeks (i'll post about that later) and i haven't played competitively for a while. i'd love to hear about your methods of studying openings and preparing for tournaments. until next time - happy chessing!

No comments:
Post a Comment